I lys av at EUs kosttilskuddsdirektiv vil redusere forbrukernes lovlige adgang til næringsstoffer i konsentrert form, og at helsepåstandreguleringen i stor grad vil forby at man påviser den klare sammenheng mellom mat (næringsstoffer i tilstrekkelig mengde) og helse, er det interessant å lese at "6 millioner briter er feilernært" og "vitamin- og mineralmangel er utbredt i Europa".

Under tittelen "Nutrition Policy and Activities in Norway" og undertittel "Creating healthy food environment "  gjorde helse- og omsorgsdepartementet, ved Mattilsynet, en presentasjon for BEUC (Den europeiske organisasjon av forbrukerorganisasjoner) i desember 2005.

Her kan vi blant annet les (side 3, under General Stategies) : 

• Make it easier for people to take responsibility for their own health

• Build alliances to promote public health

• Encourage more prevention and less cure in health services

• Build up new knowledge

På side 4 leser vi som overskrift: IMPORTANT MEASURES - NUTRITION

Myndighetene motsier seg selv

Så helse- og omsorgsdepartementet tenker altså på mat i samband med helse. Hvordan kan det samme departementet – og mattilsynet – på samme tid forholde seg til den velkjente feil- og underernæringen som er utbredt i Europa og støtte for eksempel EUs kosttilskuddsdirektiv?

I den sammenheng, hvordan kan de fortelle BEUC at de jobber for å "gjøre det lettere for folk å ta ansvaret for sin egen helse"? Jo da, det er ikke vanskelig. Oppfordre til å spise mer frukt (herunder i skolene), oppfordre til bedre matvaner på arbeidsplassen, oppfordre til fysisk aktivitet.

Og: Følge opp WHOs globale strategi for ernæring for babyer og små barn (Senere: den globale strategi for diett, fysisk aktivitet og helse).

Fagert! Vi vil her bemerke at WHO er en av FN-organisasjonene, som sammen med FAO, står bak Codex Alimentarius’ retningslinjer for vitaminer og mineraler i kosttilskudd: Den største og farligste trussel vi står over for med hensyn til helse og helsefrihet, nemlig ved å innføre – på sikt – hva som må antas å bli drakonisk begrensning av lovlig tilgang på kosttilskudd. Husk at kosttilskudd er mat i konsentrert form. Og reflektér litt på dette i lys av feil- og underernæringen i Europa.

Noen som husker begrepet double speak fra George Orwells bok "1984"?

Myndighetene bør følge sine egne ord

De bør ”gjøre det enklere å ta ansvar for egen helse” gjennom å tillate alle sunne og effektive naturmidler, selv om det strider med Legemiddelloven (som sier at alt naturlig som er virksomt, skal omklassifiseres til legemidler.)

De bør støtte folkebevegelsen som ønsker økologisk mat, billig frukt og grønt og anledning til å forsterke helsen sin via tilskudd av viktige næringsstoffer naturmidler.

De bør oppmuntre til forebygging innen helsevesenet, og ikke forhindre dette gjennom bl.a. Legemiddelloven og norsk byråkrati, som i effekt motarbeider nettopp dette.

De bør bygge opp ny kunnskap, og dermed oppdatere seg på naturlige terapier, I stedet for å støtte et konvensjonelt medisinsk regime, som sikter på å drepe symptomer fremfor å forebygge sykdom og helseplager. Legemiddellovens § 20 hindrer den frie tale og fri og sannferdig informasjon.

Et enkelt sted å begynne er jo å gjøre næringsstoffstatus til det fundamentale element i all helseundersøkelse. For vanlige mennesker. På skolen og i barnehagen. Spesielt kanskje for de eldre og sykehuspasienter.

Bare å sett i gang!  Med et eksperiment i hvert fall. Resultatet vi gi det generelle  nødvendig momentum. Og JA! – vi helsebevisste skattebetalere er villige til å betale regningen!

Jan Klyve & Børge Eliassen

Fritt Helsevalg

31 oktober 2007

Six million Britons are malnourished say experts

May 10, 2007

Kilde: http://www.naturalproductsonline.co.uk/home.asp?ItemID=2836&rcid=70&pcid=69&cid=70

Up to 3.6 million people in Britain are suffering from malnutrition with growing numbers being treated for deficiency diseases, reports The Independent.

Research carried out by the British Association of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (BAPEN) has revealed that malnutrition currently costs the NHS more than £7.3 billion a year. This is double the estimated cost of treating obesity related disease in Britain.

BAPEN says that up to 6% of the population could be suffering from malnutrition and serious vitamin and mineral deficiencies caused by poor diet. They say that the problem is being fuelled by a growing reliance on pre-prepared foods and falling levels of micronutrients in fresh fruit and vegetables. Vitamin levels were also being compromised by binge drinking, excess sugar consumption and drug use.

The latest figures available (2002) showed that 2,729 people in English hospitals were diagnosed with malnutrition. Worrying numbers were suffering conditions usually found in the poorest parts of Africa.

Dr Mike Stroud, senior lecturer at the Institute of Human Nutrition, University of Southampton, told The Independent: “The modern diet is not providing enough vitamins. Malnourishment is going to make you more vulnerable to illnesses and less able to cope with them. The medical profession is only just beginning to take on board the implications.”

Link to British Association of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (BAPEN)

http://www.bapen.org.uk/

Bakgrunn, BAPEN pressemelding. http://www.bapen.org.uk/res_press_rel19.html

Vitamin and mineral deficiencies are widespread in Europe

av Paul Anthony Taylor

Kilde: http://www4.dr-rath-foundation.org/THE_FOUNDATION/vitamin_and_mineral_deficiencies_are_widespread.html

So why is the European Commission planning to ban thousands of supplements when it has already admitted that most of them are safe?

Evidence increasingly suggests that vitamin and mineral deficiencies are widespread in the European Union. A recent report, for example, suggests that up to 3.6 million people in the UK now suffer from malnutrition. As a result, according to the British Association for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, malnutrition currently costs the UK''s National Health Service more than £7.3bn (€10.8bn / US $14.8bn) a year.

With the estimates suggesting that up to 6 per cent of the UK population could be suffering from serious vitamin and mineral deficiencies, and UK hospital figures showing malnutrition to be found in all age groups, including newborn babies, one has to question the wisdom of an upcoming proposal from the European Commission – the European Union''s executive body – that threatens to ban thousands of vitamin and mineral supplements from being sold in Europe.

After all, it''s not as if the problem of nutritional deficiencies was only confined to the UK.

In 1997, for example, a report by the European Commission into nutrient intake in European Union Member States concluded that "for almost all vitamins, minerals and trace elements, there exist one or more population groups with intakes below nationally recommended levels." People thought to be particularly at risk included: women; adolescents or children (particularly "picky" ones); the elderly; women during the periconceptual period; people on a diet for losing weight; people on vegetarian diets; people having allergies to foods; persons eating a high proportion of "fast foods" or "junk foods" and others.

The nutrients found to be most often deficient included iron, iodine and vitamins B2, B6 and D; and this despite the fact that in many cases, with the exception of iodine, they were already being added to some foods as mandatory fortificants.

Restrictions on permitted nutrient levels in supplements

Given the widespread nature of nutrient deficiencies in Europe, naturopathic doctors, natural health experts and millions of consumers are currently up in arms over the fact that the European Commission is preparing to propose, before the end of this year, restrictions on the maximum permitted levels of vitamins and minerals in food supplements.

Ignoring independent studies showing that the nutrient content of our food has fallen substantially over the past few decades, as well as an an abundance of knowledge and scientific data on vitamins and nutrition that has been available for 50, 60, 70 even 80 years, it is widely expected that the levels the Commission is planning will be highly restrictive and far below those that are necessary to achieve and maintain optimum health. If these expectations are correct, therefore, the legal enforcement of such levels will result in the enactment of Europe-wide bans upon literally thousands of food supplement products, some of which have been sold and consumed safely for decades.

European Commission admits that most supplements are safe

Not for the first time, however, the European Commission''s plans are openly at odds with some of its previous assurances.

In 2002, for example, during the run-up to the adoption by the European Parliament of the controversial Food Supplements Directive, the then European Commissioner for Health and Consumer Protection, David Byrne, published a message on the internet, on behalf of the Commission, in which he claimed that "The aim is not to ban food supplements, as some have alleged."

Byrne''s message was published in response to the large number of letters that the Commission had received from citizens who were concerned about the Directive and who were opposed to its adoption. Notably, therefore, Byrne specifically stated in this message that: "There is no doubt that most of the products marketed today are safe and of the expected quality."

As such, if the maximum levels for vitamins and minerals that the Commission proposes turn out to be as low as some observers are claiming they will be, many consumers of food supplements will quite reasonably conclude that the Commission knowingly intends to ban products that it considers to be safe.

Perhaps mindful of the large numbers of European citizens who oppose the Food Supplements Directive, Byrne chose to end his message as follows: "I can assure you that your interests and those of consumers in general were at the top of our concerns when we proposed the Directive. I believe that you have every right to have a wide choice of safe and appropriately labelled food supplements available, to buy if you so wish. And I remain convinced that the Directive that will be shortly formally adopted by the European Parliament and the Council of Ministers will ensure that."

When the maximum levels are eventually announced, therefore, European citizens will finally discover whether Byrne and the Commission were telling the truth, or whether – as some have alleged – their real aim was to ban supplements and they were lying all along.